Category: finance


Global Goals

adults-agreement-beverage-567633

“A solution in the world map for manufacturing is a solution that really focuses on image, enables a distinct way to pull wide information that is needed for a mobilised selective achivement in a perceptive direction to an eco system that creates applications quicklier.”

A great example is Honeywell, that has a structure build on constructiveness and decisiveness into directive portals, attempting an inclusion established with their partners. As a result, the tighten relationship with other colaborative partners have increased the subscriptions on customers and become in this way able in using all informations detained to create a strong and valuable service.


Default

NEWS & OVERVIEW DISCUSSIONS

Real-Time Insight

black-business-clocks-48770

Predicting and innovating faster for real time wave analytics using information, predicting and personalizing in a mobile way, contextualize all data for devices, customers and the location data connected in real-time.

“Extending the value chains on mobile communities for suppliers, partners and customers, and after all proactively driving the customer journey, it’s very, very powerful.”

A great example is what Caterpillar does by collecting data for such a long period of time. But looking in the present time, collecting data not only for fluids and oils, tiers, pressures, this movement of equipments are mobilising and extending in purchasing all this provided concepts delivered into the next chain, becoming suitable in their persistence and able to assume more information into deciding a simple and predictable way.

So, achieving more powerful tools can be an impressive touch, even more attempting than just a look at the internal insights, versus all the operations that consists outside the box perspectives.



Default

Latest News & Developments in Business Strategy Practice

Infinite Map

book-eyeglasses-eyewear-159743



The dividend policy

A company will have a direct impact on the amount of retained earning available for investment. A company which consistently pays out a high proportion of distributable profits as dividends will not have much by way of retained earnings and so is likely to use a higher proportion of external finance when funding investment projects.

“Corporations with more diverse boards of directors are less prone to take risks and more likely to pay dividends to stockholders than firms whose boards are more homogenous.”

Firms need to take risks to run business. However, excessive risk taking may endanger their survival. Therefore, investors and regulators have broadened the board’s role to include corporate risk oversight, especially since the wake of the financial crisis in the late 2000s.

Most research on board diversity has focused only on gender diversity.
We used a broader-than-normal definition of diversity, encompassing gender, race, age, experience, tenure and expertise.

We looked at company records and employed five variables to measure risk: capital expenditures, research and development expenses, acquisition spending, the volatility of stock returns and the volatility of accounting returns.
The first three variables are direct measures of corporate risk as firms can adjust risk by directly altering their investment policies and spending. The last two variables measure corporate risk taking using the volatility of firms’ market and accounting performances.

“Firms with more diverse boards spend less on capital expenditure, R&D and acquisitions, and exhibit lower volatilities of stock returns than those with less diverse boards.”

Additional analysis showed that companies with more diverse boards were more likely to pay dividends and to pay a greater amount of dividend per share than corporations with less diverse boards. In general, risk-averse firms are more likely to avoid investment projects with uncertain outcomes and return cash to shareholders in the form of dividends.
Having this insight can help avoid costly cultural mistakes at both large corporations and small businesses. Studies showes that most corporate boards are relatively homogenous in gender and race – being mostly white and male. There was, however, considerably more diversity when we factored in characteristics such as age, experience, tenure and expertise.

Measuring diversity based only on gender misrepresents the actual diversity in corporate boardrooms.
On the one hand, diverse boards could reduce the level of corporate risk taking, discouraging innovative and risky projects.

On the other hand, if firm management is overly aggressive in its use of corporate funds for investing in risky projects, our results suggest that more diverse boards could perform better oversight of corporate risk taking than less diverse boards.
Rini Laksmana, associate professor of accounting at Kent State University, and Agus Harjoto, associate professor of finance at Pepperdine University, collaborated on the research for the project reviews.


Default

Latest News & Developments in Business Strategy Practice

Help Ecosystems

iggff

Executive sponsorship

In order to change management to help the entire organisation uses marketing people alignment because timing is everything.

Corporate venture capital is picking up speed in the investment industry, as large companies start setting aside funds for external investment in fledgling companies or startups. Tech giants like Intel, Dell and AMD all have strong track records with their proprietary funds, and more companies like Microsoft and Salesforce are now entering the venture-fund game.

During the past four years more than 475 corporate venture funds have started, bringing the worldwide total to more than 1,100, according to Global Corporate Venturing. With this surge comes a lot of uncertainty.

 

How will corporate venture-capital players influence the funding ecosystem?

Entrepreneurs need to know when choosing between corporate and traditional venture-capital partnership. Large companies can be slow moving and bulky, making it tricky to come up with innovative products or services. That’s especially true for the pharmaceutical, technology and telecommunications industries where internal R&D usually means more hiring, higher capital expenditures and increased fixed operating costs, all without the guarantee of a return.

A corporate venture fund, however, provides an opportunity for innovation without paying high R&D costs or incurring too much risk. Corporate venture capital also lets large companies operate on a smaller scale, which lets them innovate faster, conduct research on disruptive technologies and pre-empt competitors. And it’s an efficient way for companies to explore potential acquisition targets.

Data from Crunchbase shows that about one-third of corporate venture-backed startups have been acquired, versus 10 percent of startups with funding only from private venture capital.

Corporations can use their venture arms to influence their industry’s ecosystem by identifying new markets and building up their existing businesses. According to a recent Volans report,

“Corporate venture capital accounted for 1,068 investment deals worth $19.6 billion last year.”

Since 5,753 venture-capital transactions worth $48.5 billion occurred in 2013, corporate ventures comprised nearly 20 percent of all deals and 40 percent of transaction value worldwide.

A traditional venture-capital firm raises money primarily from institutional investors and high-net-worth individuals, while corporate venture capital uses cash reserves from a parent company to fund new endeavors. This difference is significant because it means more external pressure is typically put on independent venture-capital firms to generate above-average returns.

Since corporate ventures are typically considered R&D alternatives, expenses are already built into the business structure. And separate revenue-generating businesses help offset any corporate venture-capital losses. That’s a safety net that traditional venture-capital firms don’t have. Corporate venture-capital efforts also have the advantage of involvement with startups at the early stages, when they can most benefit from access to a large, established customer base, credibility through brand association and a larger network of partner companies and advisors.

Corporate venture-capital efforts can make good co-investment partners with traditional venture capital firms because each brings different expertise to the table. Venture-capital firms have the drive and know-how to realize financial results while corporate-venture capital groups provide industry knowledge and a talent pool.

 

Given all these advantages, why isn’t a larger proportion of total deals in the venture-capital space taken up by corporate funds?

For one, independent venture-capital firms still hold a competitive advantage over their corporate counterparts due to their flexibility, speed and experience in helping companies succeed financially. Corporate venture-capital firms that benefit from high cash flows might be willing to spread out their investments over a few similar companies and take a back seat in terms of driving their growth, while a venture-capital firm is typically motivated to take a more focused and hands-on approach for its portfolio companies.

Corporations have been actively investing in venture capital since the mid-1960s, when the venture capital industry itself was just emerging. But as more corporations become involved, the emphasis on how to build the next generation of businesses could shift away from high valuations and quick exits to creating a nurturing environment for bigger and better ideas.


Default

Latest News & Developments in Business Strategy Practice

accomplishment-achievement-adult-1059120
As the holiday season approaches, you may be thinking about employee gifts. While everyone appreciates a holiday treat, Cindy Ventrice, author of Make Their Day! Employee Recognition that Works (Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2009) says holiday gifts and bonuses are now considered an entitlement in many organizations rather than a reward for hard work. People bank on their holiday bonuses.

“They plan their vacations, their gift giving, some plan it right into their income in terms of paying their bills. So, there is no appreciation element in many cases. They’re not seeing it as the reward. They see it as a piece of their compensation,”

says Ventrice.

While Ventrice is clear that companies shouldn’t do away with the holiday bonus, she argues that true recognition is not given through a one-time bonus check. Here are four things to consider when deciding how to thank your employees.

1. Include a personal message

“We often overlook the strength of written praise,”

says Ventrice.

She gives the example of an employee who kept handwritten notes of praise for years, pulling them out when they needed a confidence boost.

When you take a little bit of extra effort to put it in writing, it pays you back many times over. People read that over and over again,”

she says.

Messages should include specifics about the employee’s work and what was appreciated. They can be included in employee’s bonus envelopes or made into a group experience, such as a message board handwritten notes highlighting at least one thing that you value about each employee.

2. Know your audience

Ventrice says it’s difficult to come up with best practices when it comes to employee gifts because rewards will mean different things to different groups. Understanding what will make your staff enthusiastic is the first step in determining appropriate rewards.

“Know your staff – who they are and what they’re going to value,”

says Ventrice.

While a white water rafting adventure may be the perfect team-building reward for a young, fun office, a formal dinner at a fancy restaurant may be more suitable for a serious work culture.

3. Offer non-monetary compensation

Ventrice surveyed over 200 employees from 98 companies to find out what rewards they valued the most.

Across all ages and cultures, time off was absolutely number one,”

she says.

Flex time given for a specific accomplishment in the form of a longer lunch hour or going home early is a great way to show appreciation for a job well done.
The study confirmed that the cost of recognition awards has only minimal impact on employee perception of appreciation. Fifty-seven percent reported that the most meaningful recognition was free.Other forms of recognition that scored high included opportunities to learn from senior staff or take a course that wasn’t offered to everyone, and being given challenging assignments.

“Programs run by managers who know what makes recognition meaningful and know how to provide it translate into higher engagement, retention, loyalty and productivity,”

says Ventrice.


Default

Latest News for Strategy Business Developments
brunobertez

Il n'est de vérité que du tout

"Daily Tools" Black Book

Inspired by the book "Love is the killer app" by Tim Sanders

Rusty's Midday Extravaganza

Radio: stream.967theeagle.com

Delusional Bubble

Life is a bubble, Make it as delusional as possible!

The Truth for Kyle Brennan

Scientology & the Death of Kyle Brennan

zara hasan

#creativity starts here

KASHiVOLOGY

The conversations

MISCELLANEOUS MUCH

Tapestry of Life: Writer. Blogger. Meme Creator. All the miscellaneous things that make up our lives.

sharmisthashabdkalrav

#gujarati #gujaratipoetry #gazals #gujaratisongs #gujarati stories #hindi poetry

PoeticBelle by Srishti Mundhra

Dichotomy | Contrast | Life

A Readmill of my mind

We are such stuff as dreams are made on, and our little life is rounded with a sleep.

Diferentes Tons

Artes, Moda, Literatura